The Levellers' conception of legitimate authority
Palabras clave:
limited sovereignty, constitution, people, law, rightsResumen
This article examines the Levellers’ doctrine of legitimate authority, by showing how it emerged as a critique of theories of absolute sovereignty. For the Levellers, any arbitrary power is tyrannical, insofar as it reduces human beings to an unnatural condition. Legitimate authority is necessarily founded on the people, who creates the constitutional order and remains the locus of political power. The Levellers also contend that parliamentary representation is not the only mechanism by which the people may acquire a political being; rather the people outside Parliament are the collective agent able to transform and control institutions and policies. In this sense, the Levellers hold that a highly participative community should exert sovereignty, and that decentralized government is a means to achieve that goal.
Descargas
Métricas
Citas
[Anon] Touching the Fundamentall Lawes [1643]. In: Malcolm, Joyce Lee, The Struggle for Sovereignty: Seventeenth-Century English Political Tracts, 2 vols. (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund). Vol. 1, 1999.
Ferne, Henry. The Resolving of Conscience [1642]. In: Malcolm, Joyce Lee, The Struggle for Sovereignty: Seventeenth-Century English Political Tracts. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1999.
Harrington, James. The Oceana and Other Works of James Harrington, with an Account of His Life by John Toland. London: Becket and Cadell, 1711.
Harrington, James. Oceana and Other Writings. Ed. Pocock, J. G. A.; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Herle, Charles. An answer to a Treatise [1642]. In: Malcolm, Joyce Lee. The Struggle for Sovereignty: Seventeenth-Century English Political Tracts. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Vol. I, 1999.
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Hunton, Philip. A Treatise of Monarchy. E. 103. (15). 1643.
Hunton, Philip.A Vindication of the Treatise of Monarchy. E. 39. (12.), 1644.
Jones, Captain. Plain English or the sectaries anatomized. E. 350. (11.), 1646.
Kenyon, J. P. The Stuart Constitution, Documents and Documentary. Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Lilburne, John. In the 150 page of the Book..; q.v. 669f-10-33, 1645.
Lilburne, John. The Free-mans Freedom Vindicated, E. 341. (12.) 1646.
Lilburne, John. London’s Liberty in Chains Discovered”. In: Hart, David & Kenyon, Ross (eds). Tracts on Liberty by the Levellers and their Critics (1638-1660). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Vol. 3 (1646b), 2014.
Lilburne, John . An Appeal from the Commons to the Free People. E.398. (28.), 1647.
Lilburne, John & Overton, Richard. The Out-cryes of Opressed Commons. In: Hart, David & Kenyon, Ross (ed). Tracts on Liberty by the Levellers and their Critics (1638-1660). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Vol. 3. (1646), 2014.
Lilburne, John. Foundations of Freedom. In: Woodhouse, A. P. S (ed). Puritanism and Liberty London: J.M. Dent and Sons Lt. (1648), 1938.
Lilburne, John. Legal Fundamental Liberties. In: Woodhouse, A.S.P. (ed). Puritanism and Liberty. London: J.M. Dent and Sons Lt. (1649), 1938.
Nedham, Marchamont. The Levellers levell'd, Or, The Independents conspiracie to root out monarchie. An interlude. Wing (2nd ed.) / N394, 1647.
Nedham, Marchamont. (1650). The Case of the Commonwealth clearly Stated. N 377 1153_13 (1650).
Overton, Richard. Divine Observations upon the London Ministers. E. 315. (15.), 1645.
Overton, Richard. An Alarum to the House of Lords. E. 346. (8.), 1646a.
Overton, Richard. A Defiance against all Arbitrary Usurpations and Encroachments. E. 353. (17.), 1646b.
Overton, Richard An Arrow against all Tyrants and Tyranny. E. 356. (14.), 1646c.
Overton, Richard. A Remonstrance of many thousands citizens, and other freeborn people of England, to their own House of Commons. E. 343. (11.), 1646d.
Overton, Richard. An Appeal from the Commons to the Free People. In: Woodhouse, A.S.P. Puritanism and Liberty, being the Army Debates. University of Chicago Press (1647), 1951
Parker, Henry. The case of shipmoney. In: Malcolm, Joyce Lee (ed). The Struggle for Sovereignty: Seventeenth-Century English Political Tracts, 2 vols, ed. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Vol. 1, (1641).1999.
Parker, Henry. Observations upon some of his Majesties late Answers and Expresses, 1642.
Parker, Henry. Accommodation cordially desired. E. 101. (23.), 1643.
Parker, Henry. Jus Populi. E. 12. (25.), 1644.
Walwyn, William. A Helpe to the right understanding of a Discourse concerning Independency. In: Hart, David & Ross, Kenyon (ed). Tracts on Liberty by the Levellers and their Critics (1638-1660), 7 vols.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Vol. 2 (1645a), 2014.
Walwyn, William. England’s Lamentable Miseries. E. 304. (19.), 1645b.
Walwyn, William. The Just Man in Bonds, A-71202, 1646a.
Walwyn, William . A Pearle in a doughhill. In: Hart, David & Ross, Kenyon (ed). Tracts on Liberty by the Levellers and their Critics (1638-1660), 7 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Vol. 3 (1646b), 2014.
Walwyn. Tolleration Justified, and Persecution Condemn’d; In: Hart, David & Kenyon, Ross (ed.), Tracts on Liberty by the Levellers and their Critics (1638-1660), 7 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Vol. 3 (1646c), 2014.
Walwyn, William. Gold Tried in the Fire. E. 392. (19.), 1647.
Walwyn, William. The Bloudy Projetc, E. 460. (4.), 1648.
Wildman, John. England’s Miserie and Remedie. E. 302. (5.), 1645.
An Agreement of the People (1647). In: Sharp, Andrew (ed). The English Levellers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
An Agreement of the Free People. E. 552. (23.), 1649.
Certain articles for the good of the commonwealth (1647). In: Woodhouse, A.S.P., Puritanism and Liberty, being the Army Debates (1647); University of Chicago Press, 1951
Instructions agreed upon as the sence of the Petitioners of Buckinghampshire and Hartford Shir. In: Hart, David & Ross, Kenyon (eds). Tracts on Liberty by the Levellers and their Critics (1638-1660), 7 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Vol. 3 (1646), 2014.
The Case of the Army truly Stated. E. 411. (9.), 1647.
The Putney Debates (1647). In: Sharp, Andrew (ed). The English Levellers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Secondary sources
Baker, Philip. “The Levellers, Decentralisation and the Agreements of the People”. In: Vernon, Elliot & Baker, Philip. The Agreements of the People, the Levellers, and the Constitutional Crisis of the English Revolution. Hampshire: Palgrave-MacMilliam, 2012
Braddick, Michael. God’s Fury, England’s Fire: A New History of the English Civil Wars. Penguin. United Kingdom, 2008.
Como, Davi. “An Unattributed Pamphlet by William Walwyn: New Light on the Prehistory of the Leveller Movement”. Huntington Library Quarterly, Vol. 69, No. 3 (September), 2006.
Cromartie, Alan. “Parliamentary Sovereignty, Popular sovereignty, and Henry Parker’s adjudicative standpoint”. In: Bourke, Richard & Skinner, Quentin. Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: University Press, 2016; pp. 142-163.
Dunn, John. The History of Political Theory and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Davis, J. C. English Radicalism, 1550-1850: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Dzelzainis, Martin. “History and Ideology: Milton, the Levellers, and the Council of State in 1649”. In: The Huntington Library Quarterly, Vol. 68, No. 1/2, pp. 269-287, 2005.
Foxley, Rachel. John Lilburne and the citizenship of ‘Free-born Englishmen”. The Historical Joumal, 47, 4 (2004), pp. 849-874.
Foxley, Rachel. The Levellers – Radical political thought in the English Revolution. Manchester University Press, 2013.
Fukuda, Arihiro. Sovereignty and the Sword, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).
Greene, Thomas A. Verdict According to Conscience: Perspectives on the English Criminal Trial Jury. Chicago, 1985.
Hoekstra, Kinch. “Early Modern Absolutism and Constitutionalism”. In: Cardozo Law Review, 34, 2013.
Lee, Daniel. Popular Sovereignty in Early Modern Constitutional Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Loughlin, Martin.“The constitutional thought of the Levellers”. In: Current Legal Problems, 60, 2007. p. 7.
Loughlin, Martin. “The concept of constituent power”, European Journal of Political Theory. Vol 13, Issue 2, 2014.
Manin, Bernard. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Mendle, Michael. Henry Parker and the English Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Orr, D. Alan. “Constitutionalism: Ancient, Modern and Early Modern in the Agreements of the People”. In: Elliot Vernon & Philip Baker (eds). The Agreements of the People, the Levellers, and the Constitutional Crisis of the English Revolution. Hampshire: Palgrave-MacMilliam 2012.
Peacey, Jason. “The people of the Agreements”. In: Elliot Vernon & Philip Baker (eds). The Agreements of the People, the Levellers, and the Constitutional Crisis of the English Revolution. Hampshire: Palgrave-MacMilliam 2012.
Pitkin, Hanna. The Concept of Representation. University of California Press: Berkeley, 1972.
Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1975.
Purkiss, Diane. The English Civil War: A People’s History. Harper Collins. United Kingdom, 2012.
Rosanvallon, Pierre. Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Sabbadini, Lorenzo. “Popular sovereignty and representation in the English Civil War”. In: Bourke, Richard & Skinner, Quentin (eds). Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: University Press, 2016.
Salmon, J.H. M. The French Religious Wars in English Political Though. Clarendon Press, 1959.
Scott, Jonathan. “The rapture of motion: James’s Harrington republicanism”. In: Philipson, Nicholas & Skinner, Quentin (eds). Political Discourses in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Scott, Jonathan. England’s Troubles: Seventeenth-Century English Political Instability in European Context. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, vol. II, 1978.
Skinner, Quentin. “Rethinking Political Liberty”. History Workshop Journal, 6; pp. 156-170. 2006.
Thomas, Keith. “The Levellers and the Franchise”. In: Ayler, G. (ed.). The Interregnum. London, 1974.
Tuck, Richard. Philosophy and Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Tully, James. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Urbinati, Nadia. Representative Democracy. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
Vernon, Elliot. “A Firme and Present Peace; Upon Grounds of Common Right and Freedome’: The Debate on the Agreements of the People and the Crisis of the Constitution, 1647–59”. In: Vernon, Elliot & Baker, Philip Baker. The Agreements of the People, the Levellers, and the Constitutional Crisis of the English Revolution. Hampshire: Palgrave-MacMilliam, 2012.
Vernon, Elliot & Baker, Philip. “What was the first Agreement of the People?”, Historical Journal 53, 2010.
Vernon, Elliot & Baker, Baker. The Agreements of the People, the Levellers, and the Constitutional Crisis of the English Revolution. Hampshire: Palgrave-MacMilliam, 2012.
Worden, Blair.“The Levellers in history and memory, c. 1660-1960”. In: Mendle, Michael (ed.). The Putney Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Woolrych, Austin. “The debates from the perspective of the Army”. In: Mendle, Michael (ed.). The Putney Debates of 1647. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Wootton, David. “From Rebellion to Revolution: the crisis of the winter of 1642/3 and the origins of civil war radicalism”. English Historical Review, 105, 1990.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Las ediciones impresa y electrónica de esta Revista son editadas por el Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.Salvo indicación contraria, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional”
. Puede consultar desde aquí la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia. Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario.
