Doctor Mill y Mister Hyde: una ontología para el imperialismo liberal

Dr. Mill and Mr. Hyde: An Ontology for Liberal Imperialism

Autores/as

  • Víctor M. Sánchez Byron Books, Huygens Editorial

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2025.i60.15

Palabras clave:

imperialismo, Mill, derecho internacional, colonialismo, etnocentrismo, misión civilizadora, racismo, guerra

Resumen

El texto analiza la obra de Mill a la luz de las tradiciones medievales sobre la alteridad y la moralidad internacional. Su antropología política, que distingue entre pueblos civilizados y bárbaros, lo sitúa dentro del marco ontológico medieval del canonista Segusio, frente a Inocencio IV. Mill adopta un etnocentrismo que legitima la dominación colonial como una “misión civilizadora”. El artículo también establece paralelos entre el imperialismo liberal de Mill, el nazismo y la globalización liberal militar del s. XX. El autor concluye que las ideas de Mill operan menos como filosofía moral que como formas literarias de propaganda imperialista.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Agustín de Hipona, De opere monachorum, 400, disponible en: https://

la.wikisource.org/wiki/De_Opere_Monachorum.

Anand, RP, “The Influence of History on the Literature of International Law”,

[en R. St J. Macdonald y D. M. Johnston (eds.), The Hague, Martinus

Nijhoff Publishers, 1983], pp. 341-380.

Aristóteles, Política, Gredos, 1988.

Bell, D, “John Stuart Mill on colonies’, Political Theory, 38(1), (2010), pp.

34-64.

Besson, S y Tasioulas, J, “The marginalization of normative inquiry into

international law”, [en The Philosophy of International Law, eds. S.

Besson y J. Tasioulas, Oxford, Oxford University Press], 2010.

Boisard, MA, “On the probable influence of Islam on Western Public and

International Law”, International Journal of Middle East Studies, v. II,

(1980), pp. 429‑450.

Campbell, CG, “Mill’s Liberal Project and Defence of Colonialism from a

Post-Colonial Perspective”, South African Journal of Philosophy, 29(2),

(2010), pp. 63-73.

Carlyle, Th, “Occasional Discourse on the Negro Question”, Fraser’s Magazine,

XL (1849).

Carty, A, Philosophy of International Law, Edinburgh University Press, 2007.

Cavallar, GP “Vitoria, Grotius, Pufendorf, Wolff and Vattel: Accomplices of

European Colonialism and Exploitation or True Cosmopolitans?”, Journal

of the History of International Law, 10 2 (2008), pp. 181‑209.

Cobden, R, How Wars Are Got Up in India: The Origins of the Burmese War,

Londres, 1853.

Czapliński, W, “Paweł Włodkowic (Paulus Vladimiri) and the Polish

International Legal Doctrine of the 15th Century.” Baltic Yearbook of

International Law Online, V. 7 n. 1 (2007), pp. 65–82.

Craven, M, “Theorizing the Turn to History in International Law”, [en Anne

Orford y Florian Hoffmann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Theory

of International Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016], pp. 21-37.

Cuvier, G, Tableau élémentaire de l’histoire naturelle des animaux, Paris, 1798.

Das Guota, T, Race and Racialization: Essential Readings, 2007.

Espín, O, y Nickoloff, JB (eds), An Introductory Dictionary of Theology and

Religious Studies, Liturgical Press, 2007.

Fitzmaurice, A, “The genealogy of Terra Nullius”, Australian Historical

Studies, 38:129 (2007), pp. 1-15.Forth, Ch.E, “Mussolini’s ‘Third Rome’, Hitler’s Third Reich and the Allure of

Antiquity: Classicizing Chronopolitics as a Remedy for Unstable National

Identity”, Fascism: Journal of Comparative Fascist Studies, vol. 8, no. 2

(2019), pp. 127-149.

Gobineau, JA, Essai sur l’inégalité des races humaines, t. IV (1853–1855).

Grollios, V , “Philosophy of history and philosophical anthropology in J.S.

Mill’s views on colonialism”, Journal of Political Ideologies, 19:2 (2014),

pp. 187-206.

Grotius, H., De iure belli ac pacis, libri tres, v.1 y v. 2, Clarendon, 1925.

Habibi, D, “The moral dimensions of J. S. Mill’s colonialism”, Journal of

Social Philosophy, 30(1), (1999), pp. 125-146.

Kames, Sketches of the History of Man, Book I, ECCO.

Kenneth, E, “John Stuart Mill’s Theory of International Relations”, Journal of

the History of Ideas, V. 22 4, 1961, pp. 493-514

Las Casas, B, De regia potestate, CSIC, 1969.

López de Segovia, J, De la confederación de príncipes y de la guerra y de los

guerreros, Asociación Francisco de Vitoria, 1931.

Marx, K,

-“El dominio británico en la India”’, New York Daily Tribune, 25 de junio de

1853;

- “Los resultados futuros del dominio británico en la India”, New York Daily

Tribune, 8 de agosto de 1853.

Mill, JS, [en The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, editado por JM Robson

y AP Robson]:

- Essay on Gibbon’s History of the Decline and

Fall of the Roman Empire (1828), vol. XX.

- “The Spirit of the Age” (1831), XXII.

- “Wakefield’s The New British Province of South Australia” (1834), vol.

XXIII, p. 739. -“The Spanish Question” (1835), XXII.

- “Civilization” (1836), XVIII.

- Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to

Social Philosophy (1848), Vols. II-III, Principles of Political Economy.

- “The Negro Question” (1850), XXI.

- Diary, (1854), Vol. XXVII.

- “On Treaties” (1856), XXI.

- Memorandum of the Improvements in the Administration

of India During the Last Thirty Years, (1858), Vol. XXX.

- “A Few Words on Non-Intervention” (1859), XXI.

- “Considerations on Representative Government” (1861), XIX.

- “The Slave Power” (1862–63), XXI.Mill, JS Sobre la libertad (1859), Byron Books, 2024.

Mukherjee, R. “‘Satan Let Loose Upon Earth’: The Kanpur Massacres in India

in the Revolt of 1857,” Past & Present, 128, no. 1 (1990), pp. 92–116.

Muldoon, J, Popes, Lawyers, and Infidels: The Church and the Non-

Christian World, 1250–1550, Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, 1979.

Nys, E, “Les publicistes espagnols du XVIe siècle et les droits des Indiens”,

Revue de droit international et de législation comparée, 21 (1889), pp. 532-560.

Pereña, L, Conde, J., La Escuela de Salamanca: el legado de paz de

Francisco de Vitoria, Univ. Francisco de Vitoria, 2002.

Priestley, J, The Doctrine of Philosophical Necessity Illustrated, Londres, 1777.

Reynolds, H, The Law of the Land, Penguin Books Australia, 1992.

Roberts, M, “Chartism”. Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique, XXX-1

(2025).

Sepulvedae Cordubensis, Genesii, Democrates alter, sive de justis belli causis

apud Indos (Demócrates segundo o De las justas causas de la guerra

contra los indios), Real Academia de la Historia, t. 21, 1892.

Shetty, S, “John Stuart Mill’s “India”: Liberalism in an age of colonial

domination”, Literature Interpretation Theory, 5:2 (1994), pp. 135-154.

Smits, K, “John Stuart Mill on the Antipodes: Settler Violence against

Indigenous Peoples and the Legitimacy of Colonial Rule”, Australian

Journal of Politics and History, 54 1, (2008), pp. 1-15.

Stent, GC, Scraps from my Sabretasche: Being Personal Adventures While in

the 14th (King’s Light) Dragoons, Londres, Allen & Co., 1882.

Tubau, X., “Las alianzas a la luz del derecho canónico: El Tractatus Dialogicus

de Confoederatione Principum et Potentatum (c. 1495) de Juan López de

Segovia”, Anuario de Estudios Medievales, 40/2 (2010), pp. 537-563.

Varouxakis, G.

- “John Stuart Mill on Race”, Utilitas, 10, (1998), pp. 17-32.

- JS Mill on international relations, Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Voltaire, Essai sur les moeurs et l’esprit des nations (1756), Paris, Garnier,

1963.

Wight, M, International Theory, The Three Traditions, New York, 1992.

Williams, D, “John Stuart Mill and the practice of colonial rule in India”,

Journal of International Political Theory, (2020), pp. 1-17.

Descargas

Publicado

2025-10-14

Cómo citar

M. Sánchez, V. (2025). Doctor Mill y Mister Hyde: una ontología para el imperialismo liberal : Dr. Mill and Mr. Hyde: An Ontology for Liberal Imperialism. Araucaria, 27(60). https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2025.i60.15