Heritage Contraband: Mapping US Policy to Combat International Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/CEC.2025.i11.05Keywords:
illicit trafficking of cultural property, 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property, 1970 UNESCO Convention, Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act, Safeguard Tribal Objects of Patrimony Act, US Cultural Heritage PolicyAbstract
While the US has shown leadership in advocating for cultural heritage protection on the global stage since WWII, its hesitancy and delays in ratifying or implementing key conventions, along with repeated withdrawals from UNESCO, suggest otherwise regarding its commitment. 21st-century geopolitics have elevated the fight against illicit trafficking of cultural property, emphasizing not only the safeguarding of humanity’s collective heritage but also the maintenance of international relations and national security for the US, which has led to policy responses. This research evaluates US policies aimed at countering international illicit trafficking of cultural property, highlighting the need for reassessment in light of new global dynamics and recent legislative changes. The variety in policy motivations and dynamics, influenced by global power balances and Indian relations, indicates that current policies to control international illicit trafficking of cultural property have significant gaps. Mapping these policies reveals inconsistencies and deficiencies in the US’s efforts to combat this issue, underscoring the urgent need for improvements.
Downloads
References
Association on American Indian Affairs. (2014). A guide to international repatriation: Starting an initiative in your community. https://www.indian-affairs.org/uploads/8/7/3/8/87380358/international_repatriation_guide.pdf
Borke, K. E. (2003). Searching for a solution: An analysis of the legislative response to the Iraqi antiquities crisis of 2003. DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 13, 381. https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip/vol13/iss2/5
Borelli, S., & Lenzerini, F. (Eds.). (2012). Cultural heritage, cultural rights, cultural diversity: New developments in international law. Boston: BRILL.
Brocx, M. (2008). Geoheritage: From global perspectives to local principles for conservation and planning. Western Australian Museum.
Cultural Heritage Administration. (2021, December 6). News release. https://www.cha.go.kr/newsBbz/selectNewsBbzView.do?newsItemId=155703135§ionId=b_sec_1&pageIndex=1
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (n.d.). What we investigate. https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/violent-crime/art-crime
Folkinshteyn, B. (2007). National treasure: Implicit protections of cultural property in the United States. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 37(2), 143–169. https://doi.org/10.3200/JAML.37.2.143-169
Gibbon, K. F. (2018). National Stolen Property Act: Primary US cultural property law. Cultural Property News. https://culturalpropertynews.org/national-stolen-property-act-primary-us-cultural-property-law/
Goldberg, A. (2006). Reaffirming McClain: The National Stolen Property Act and the abiding trade in looted cultural objects. UCLA Law Review, 53, 1031–1071. https://www.uclalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/31_53UCLALRev10312005-2006.pdf
Gutchen, M. A. (1982). The Maya crisis and the law: Current United States legal practice and the international law of the Maya antiquities trade. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 1, 283–309. https://repository.arizona.edu/bitstream/handle/10150/659612/23_1ArizJIntlCompL_283_1982.pdf?sequence=1
Helmore, E. (2023, July 1). US set to rejoin UNESCO after leaving during Trump presidency. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/01/us-set-to-rejoin-unesco-after-leaving-during-trump-presidency
Kempf, H. L., Olson, H. C., Monarrez, P. M., Bradley, L., Keane, C., & Carlson, S. J. (2023). History of Native American land and natural resource policy in the United States: Impacts on the field of paleontology. Paleobiology, 49(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/pab.2022.41
Lalwani, N. (2020, July 19). State of the art: How cultural property became a national-security priority. Yale Law Journal Forum. https://www.yalelawjournal.org/forum
Lowthorp, L. (2010). National intangible cultural heritage (ICH) legislation & initiatives: a case study of fourteen countries. UNESCO-New Delhi Field Office. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368351?posInSet=17&queryId=770234a1-7580-4cc3-9e3d-ac816524b249
McAlee, J. R. (1981). From the Boston Raphael to Peruvian pots: Limitations on the importation of art into the United States. Dickinson Law Review, 85(4). https://ideas.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/dlra/vol85/iss4/3
National Park Service. (2023, June 12). America’s geo heritage. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/americas-geoheritage.htm
O’Keefe, R. (1999). The meaning of ‘cultural property’ under the 1954 Hague Convention. Netherlands International Law Review, 46(1), 26–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S01650
Rush, L. (Ed.). (2010). Archaeology, cultural property, and the military. Boydell Press.
S. Rpt. No. 97-564. (1982). https://eca.state.gov/files/bureau/97-564.pdf
S. Rpt. No. 108-93. (2003). https://www.congress.gov/108/crpt/srpt93/CRPT-108srpt93.pdf
S. Rpt. No. 110-26. (2008). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRPT-110erpt26/html/CRPT-110erpt26.htm
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (n.d.). Fight Illicit Trafficking (1970 Convention). https://www.unesco.org/en/fight-illicit-trafficking
US Committee on Indian Affairs. (2021, July 28). To enhance protections of Native American tangible cultural heritage, and for other purposes. Senate Report 117-33. 117th Congress, 1st session.
US Department of the Interior. (2021). International repatriation of Native American cultural heritage. https://www.doi.gov/intl/-international-repatriation-assistance
US Department of Justice. (2016, April 5). U.S. Attorney announces return to Mongolia of looted dinosaur fossils. Press Release. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/us-attorney-announces-return-mongolia-looted-dinosaur-fossils
US Department of State. (2024). Best practices for the Washington Conference principles on Nazi-confiscated art. https://www.state.gov/office-of-the-special-envoy-for-holocaust-issues/best-practices-for-the-washington-conference-principles-on-nazi-confiscated-art
US Government Accountability Office. (2016). Cultural property: Protection of Iraqi and Syrian antiquities (GAO-16-673). https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-16-673.pdf
US Government Accountability Office. (2018). Native American cultural property: Additional agency actions needed to assist tribes with repatriating items from overseas auctions (GAO-18-537).
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (2021, January 14). Cultural property, art and antiquities investigations. https://www.ice.gov/features/cpaa
Watson, J. T., Young, A. J., Garcia-Lewis, A., Lucas, C., & Plummer, S. (2022). Respectful terminology in archaeological compliance. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 10(2), 140–148.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cuadernos de Economía de la Cultura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Cuadernos de Economía de la Cultura ofrece acceso abierto inmediato y gratuito a todos sus contenidos. La revista no cobra tasas por envío ni por publicación (no APCs).
Todos los artículos se publican bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución–No Comercial–Compartir Igual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
¿Qué permite esta licencia?
Los lectores pueden:
- Compartir: copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato.
- Adaptar: remezclar, transformar y crear obras derivadas.
- siempre que se cumplan tres condiciones fundamentales:
- Atribución (BY)
Debe citarse correctamente la fuente original, indicando título, autor/es, nombre de la revista y número de publicación. - No Comercial (NC)
El material no puede utilizarse con fines comerciales.derec
Cualquier uso que implique beneficio económico directo, indirecto o potencial requiere permiso expreso del autor o de la revista. - Compartir Igual (SA)
Si el material se remezcla, transforma o crea a partir de él, la obra resultante debe distribuirse bajo la misma licencia (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
Esta definición de acceso abierto se ajusta a la Iniciativa de Acceso Abierto de Budapest (BOAI).
