¿Soberanía selectiva y nueva Doctrina Monroe? Geopolítica y extranjería en la era de los Grandes Espacios schmittianos
Selective sovereignty and the new Monroe Doctrine? Geopolitics and foreignness in the age of the Schmittian Great Spaces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2025.i59.26Keywords:
Carl Schmitt, Großraum, United States, Great Spaces, Geopolitics, SovereigntyAbstract
This article addresses Carl Schmitt's 1939 book, Völkerrechtliche Großraumordnung, as a theoretical lens that allows us to understand the current crisis of multilateral discourse, the restoration of geopolitical zones of influence, and the normative crisis of international law evoked by the United States government in its foreign policy and its measures regarding immigration and asylum. This analysis strictly adheres to legal-philosophical arguments to understand the extent to which there are coincidences between the German discourse of non-intervention by foreign powers in 1939 and the current American discourse regarding foreigners and other powers. The conclusion is that, indeed, elements similar to Carl Schmitt's Great Spaces proposal are currently emerging. However, despite resonating with Schmitt's 1939 approach, American policy clashes with its own universalist liberal tradition and with the international liberal artifice that it strove to construct and that it now seeks to dismantle. This voided identity legacy prevents the US from crystallizing a homogeneous cultural and civilizational bloc in the sense of Schmitt's Großraum.
Downloads
References
Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford University Press.
Bell, D. A. (2015). The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. Princeton University Press.
Bialasiewicz, L. (2012). Off-shoring and out-sourcing the borders of Europe: Libya and EU border work in the Mediterranean. Geographical Journal, 178(3), 242–262.
Brubaker, W. R. (2015). Between Immigrants and Natives: Citizenship and Nationality in the Age of Globalization. Berghahn Books.
Carens, J. H. (2013). The Ethics of Immigration. Oxford University Press.
De Benoist, A. (2000). La Grande Séparation: Pour une écologie des civilisations. Les Éditions du Cerf.
De Genova, N. (2010). The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement. Duke University Press.
Fangler, L. (2019). IRS Targeting Immigrant Households: Tax Audits and Selective Surveillance. Migration Studies Quarterly, 5(1), 29–47.
Freund, J. (2007). The Civilian in Modern War: The ICRC, New Wars and Protection of Civilians. Routledge.
Grafe, R. (2016). The Nomos of the Earth in the 21st Century: International Law in a United Planet. Polity Press.
Honig, B. (2001). Democracy and the Foreigner. Princeton University Press.
Holmes, O. W., Jr. (1881). The Common Law. Little, Brown and Company.
Huang, Y. (2008). Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics: Entrepreneurship and the State. Cambridge University Press.
Kahn, P. W. (2011). Political Theology: Four New Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Columbia University Press.
Kalyvas, A. (2006). Democracy and the Politics of the Extraordinary: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, and Hannah Arendt. Cambridge University Press.
Koskenniemi, M. (2001). The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge University Press.
Koskenniemi, M. (2004). From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (2.ª ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Manent, P. (1996). Metamorphoses of the City: On the Western Dynamic. Princeton University Press.
Meierhenrich, J. (2011). The Legacies of Law: Long-Run Consequences of Nazi Injustice. Cambridge University Press.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. Verso.
Pei, M. (2006). China’s Trapped Transition: The Limits of Developmental Autocracy. Harvard University Press.
Posen, B. R. (2003). Command of the commons: The military foundation of U.S. hegemony. International Security, 28(1), 5–46.
Ragazzi, F. (2016). Governing by Proximity: The Securitization of Immigration Detention in Italy. European Journal of Criminology, 13(5), 523–540.
Sassen, S. (1996). Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. Columbia University Press.
Scheuerman, W. E. (1994). Between the Norm and the Exception: The Frankfurt School and the Rule of Law. MIT Press.
Scheuerman, W. E. (1999). Carl Schmitt: The End of Law. Rowman & Littlefield.
Shachar, A. (2009). The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Justice. Harvard University Press.
Sharma, N. (2020). Home Economics: Nationalism and the Making of Migrants. Duke University Press.
Schmitt, C. (2009). Teología política: Cuatro capítulos sobre la doctrina de la soberanía (M. García Morente, Trad.). Madrid: Trotta.
Schmitt, C. (2022). Völkerrechtliche Großraumordnung mit Interventionsverbot für raumfremde Mächte: Ein Beitrag zum Reichsbegriff im Völkerrecht (4ª ed.). Duncker & Humblot. https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-58650-9
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (2020). FY 2020 ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Report. Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security.
Walt, S. M. (1987). The Origins of Alliances. Cornell University Press.
Wang, H. (2011). The Rise of Modern Chinese Thought. Cambridge University Press.
Weiwei, Z. (2012). The China Wave: Rise of a Civilizational State. World Century Publishing Corporation.
Zolo, D. (2002). Invoking Humanity: War, Law and Global Order. Continuum.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Las ediciones impresa y electrónica de esta Revista son editadas por el Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.Salvo indicación contraria, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional”

