Migrant women in France: contradictions and paradoxes
115
how she often tells women: "It is the affection that kills your rights. Once you have
affection, your rights are dead”. Moreover, Zita Cabais has never confined her struggle
to her national community of belonging : it deals with universal human rights issues,
and taps into the structural core of the capitalist/patriarchal/neo-colonial system when
it comes to labour, migration and reproductive issues (Federici 2019; Moujoud et
Falquet 2018). Also, her struggle goes beyond her personal story: after winning her
personal case against her former employee more than fifteen years ago, she has
accompanied many trials against exploitative employers in domestic work, many of
which are diplomats. The problem, she explains, is that they are protected by State
impunity. Until today, the French government refuses to ratify the ILO Convention
n°189 that protects domestic workers under the rule of law.
Her story thus sheds lights on the contradiction between global institutions that
give “voice” and “recognition” to former victims of forced labour, and state politics
which systematically refuse taking responsibility for such issue. In these regards, the
making of her “success story” needs to be questioned in regards of the “Moral Empire”
(Hours et Sélim 2020). While she has gained international legitimacy and high respect
for being a former victim who fought her way out, what does this recognition of
“victimhood” mean -- when the same structural patterns that reproduce this same
condition of victimhood are kept intact? To what extend her migration traumatic
experience is making her into a “good victim” (Fassin et Rechtman 2007)? Her
“gender” category into a “global heroine” (Sélim 2016)? In different ways, these figures
nurture imaginary saving patterns that build on individual levels of responsibilities in a
context where the “market market appears more and more immoral to everyone and
calls for an overall moralization, the translation of which is the emergence of a true
moral market” (Hours et Sélim 2020).
Anthropology teaches to bridge a global, political and ideological level of
analysis, that reveals systematic patterns of domination with an understanding of what
it means to be human -- how people struggle to give sense and meaning to their lives
(Jansen et Löfving 2009; Hours et Sélim 2010; Carrier et Kalb 2015). Speaking to Zita
Cabais and hearing the power of her voice and her complete determination, there is a
clear sense that her entire life has taken the meaning of a “mission” to end human
exploitation. She creates a strong continuity between her experience as a victim and
as an activist, reminding us that “I never considered myself as a victim”; but also how
she “used my wounds to guide me”. Having built herself through the globalized system
- with its worse exploitative practices, and its best “human rights” politics -- Zita Cabais
learned how to make use of it for her endless struggle for social justice. After having
worked for the CFDT for more than 17years, she’s now in the process of creating, in
France, her own association to support victims of labour trafficking. She’s very active
on social media, where she uses her highly mediatized figure to make victims reach
out to her despite their spatialized confinement. In time when the French government
actively contributes to social disaggregation and destroys the welfare system, such a
personal initiative links with many other ones, through which women, migrants and