Theodoros Fouskas | George Koulierakis | Lola Lyberopoulou | Andrea De Maio
80
Feminist scholarship on migration underlines that in the context of globalisation
(Parreñas, 2000, 560-581) social constructions of gender and racial stereotypes drive
men and women into specific roles and organise their experiences. The presence of
women is not a new element, as female migration has always been an important
component of international migration (Hondagneu-Sotelo, 2002, 2004; Yeates, 2009;
Anderson and Shutes, 2014; Yilmaz and Ledwith, 2017; Land, 2019; Yamane, 2021).
The change is based on the economic roles that are undertaken by migrant women
during the migration process (Campani, 2000; Parreñas, 2001; Lan, 2006; Monreal
Gimeno, Terrón Caro, Cárdenas Rodríguez, 2014). More and more women are
migrating alone as heads of households and economically active subjects, while fewer
than in the past are migrating as dependents of their husbands. This new development
of international migration in relation to the participation of women has been recorded
in literature under the term “feminisation of migration” (Castles and Miller, 1998:16).
Many women from rural areas migrate autonomously or through family reunification
programmes; others, who are unskilled, migrate autonomously and at an increasing
rate from urban areas due to poverty or family issues. Those who have secondary or
higher education migrate autonomously because they are unable to find jobs
commensurate with their qualifications. Others migrate due to political unrest,
widespread violence and gender discrimination. Women also migrate following their
husbands or families. Family reunification is considered to be the easiest way to legally
enter certain countries, due to restrictive migration policies. Independent forms of
female migration include those who migrate alone or before their husbands, as both
the labour market and the gender division of labour in reception countries offer them
more employment opportunities.
The International Labour Office (ILO) (2022) stresses that domestic workers
are “those workers who perform work in or for a private household or households”.
They provide direct and indirect care services, and as such are key members of the
care economy. Their work may include tasks such as household chores (e.g.,
cleaning, cooking, washing and ironing clothes), taking care of children or elderly or
sick members of a family, gardening, guarding the house, driving for the family, and
even taking care of household pets (Table 5). A domestic worker may work on a full-
time or part-time basis, be employed in a single household or by a service provider,
be living in the residence of the employer (live-in) or in her own residence (live-out).
Social constructions of gender cannot be considered separate from social
constructions of class, race and nationality (Tyner, 1994). Migrant women are
employed as domestic workers thus as labour migrants in various countries that
continuously demand precarious, low-status/low-wage service workers and domestic
work (Tyner, 1994; Anderson, 2000; Glenn, 2010; Fouskas, 2019).
International division of labour and the feminisation of migrant wage labour (Tyner,
1994, 594; Parreñas, 2000, 563) based on patriarchy and subordination (Tyner, 1994,
594) as well as class, gendered and racial stereotypes are manifested within the
labour recruitment process (Tyner, 1994, 590), helping to channel migrant women of
the migration flows into domestic services (Tyner, 1994, 590; Lan, 2003a, 2003b;
2003c; Pyle, 2006; Lorente, 2017; Parreñas and Silvey, 2021). ILO emphasises that
at present, domestic workers often face inadequate wages, excessively long working
hours, have no guaranteed weekly day of rest and at times are vulnerable to physical,
mental and sexual abuse or restrictions on freedom of movement (ILO, 2022).